This weekend, we acquired that Joseph diGenova and his wife, Victoria Toensing, were being conflicted out of symbolizing Donald Trump in the ongoing investigation into his marketing campaign and Russian interference. This inspired Trump to tweet out:
Hmm… that does not appear accurate to me. It is not as demonstrably bogus as some of the president’s other tweets. But by the similar token, Trump cannot seriously establish that there are a bunch of respected lawyers and legislation corporations out there dying to get the job done for him.
What we do know is that several lawyers who Trump has arrived at out to have explained to him no. They’ve decided that symbolizing the President of the United States — which is usually a sought-immediately after, superior-profile engagement — is one thing their résumé can do without the need of.
Here’s a functioning listing of legislation corporations and attorneys who have decided they don’t want to depict the president. Make sure you send a note to email@example.com if there are corporations that we’re lacking or attorneys who have been approached that we just don’t know about. Here’s who we do know about:
- Brendan Sullivan, Williams & Connolly: Sullivan represented Oliver North immediately after the Iran-Contra scandal, but won’t depict Donald Trump.
- Paul Clement, Kirkland & Ellis: Clement defended DOMA — the Protection of Relationship Act — and was a major litigator in the constitutional issues to Obamacare. But he won’t depict the chief of the Republican occasion.
- Mark Filip, Kirkland & Ellis: Filip is a big-time white-collar protection law firm who served as Deputy Attorney Normal in the George W. Bush administration. He was unwilling to return to governing administration get the job done to assistance defend the recent president.
- Robert Giuffra, Sullivan & Cromwell: Guiffra represents Volkswagon in its litigation about employing products to thwart clean-air criteria, and defended UBS from disaffected Enron shareholders. Defending Trump’s money dealings from Robert Mueller was evidently not one thing he desired to do.
- Emmet Flood, Williams & Connolly: Emmet Flood represented Invoice Clinton in his impeachment listening to. Of class, Clinton was impeached (just not convicted), and we know that Trump prefers troopers who in no way captured.
- Robert S. Bennett, Hogan Lovells: Bennett represented Invoice Clinton in the Paula Jones dispute. Appears relevant.
- Theodore Olson, Gibson Dunn: Ted Olson represented George W. Bush in the Bush v. Gore scenario wherever the Supreme Court docket chose the American president. And he would like no aspect of Trump.
Once again, these are just the people we know Trump has arrived at out to, primarily based on released reviews in the push. Who knows how several lawyers have been quietly questioned, both instantly or by networks, if they’d be fascinated.
Although it’s, frankly, hilarious to search at all the well-respected attorneys who don’t want to get Donald Trump all around them, there is perhaps a further concern. If all the excellent attorneys — the kinds with reputations to preserve and ethics to uphold — refuse to depict the president, what’s still left are the “bad” attorneys. The kinds who don’t have the slightest strategy what a moral and ethical principle is.
Who did we skip? Let us know at firstname.lastname@example.org. We’ll update this post as important.
Elie Mystal is the Government Editor of Earlier mentioned the Legislation and the Legal Editor for Additional Perfect. He can be arrived at @ElieNYC on Twitter, or at email@example.com. He will resist.