As the inaugural banners were likely up in entrance of the president-elect’s resort on Pennsylvania Avenue, the world’s banks—those that experienced not previously minimize novelty-sized checks re: mortgage-backed securities, anyway—were falling in excess of them selves to do so prior to the text “E Pluribus Unum” were torn from the eagle’s beak and changed by a roll of dirty bathroom paper looking at, “America Very first.” Deutsche Lender, RBS and—after a fashion—Credit Suisse gladly handed in excess of their billions and scurried back across the Atlantic, hoping that the nuclear wintertime shortly to engulf North The united states and East Asia would be delicate ample to continue to keep accomplishing small business.
And while they were accomplishing so, they solid a wary, pitying eye toward Jes Staley and Barclays, who were obtaining a hissy in good shape in excess of the $5 billion bill Loretta Lynch experienced just handed them. Foolish fools, they considered: You just can’t fight the Justice Department. And what if Donald Trump genuinely intended what he reported about sticking it to the foreigners, and Jeff Sessions intended what he reported when he explained to the tea partiers that massive financial institutions were no friends of his? Also massive a hazard. Surely, too massive a hazard for the previously seriously impaired Barclays.
Now, Jes Staley has made mistakes in his life. This was not just one of them. For while it looked dicey, but telling the Obama Justice Department to go fuck itself has compensated off handsomely for Barclays, which is only having to pay $2 billion—less than the ding from all the Libor stuff and not even near to the most its at any time ponied up to get out of a legal jam, and absolutely very little ample to make it possible for Staley’s initial-at any time well-known transfer to go forward.
The British financial institution was the only bank to force back from the sizing of the settlement demanded by the Justice Department, prompting the prosecutor to file a lawsuit in the waning times of the Obama administration in 2016. The DOJ preferred a great of about $5 billion, but the bank refused to fork out any much more than $2 billion….
“The settlement came at the base stop of expectations and a lot faster than predicted,” reported Ian Gordon, an analyst at Investec Plc, who called it a “clear positive” and a “very pleased Easter” for the bank…. Significant financial institutions ordinarily negotiate a settlement instead than hazard a protracted and track record-detrimental courtroom showdown with U.S. legal professionals. Whilst Staley selected to fight, JPMorgan Chase & Co. CEO Jamie Dimon reported he “had no choice” but to “surrender,” agreeing to fork out $13 billion to settle related accusations.
Barclays Wins Its DOJ Gamble With $2 Billion Mortgage Settlement [Bloomberg]
Barclays to Pay $2 Billion to Solve Mortgage-Securities Promises [WSJ]
Barclays Gets Penalty It Can Live With [WSJ]