Beware of Buying A Competitor’s Name To Market Your Law Practice – My Shingle

Can attorneys use a competitor’s name as a keyword to market place their personal legislation follow? Whilst Google allows legislation firms’ to acquire competitors’ names as keywords and phrases, at minimum two states — North Carolina  and South Carolina  —  forbid this follow, discovering it inherently deceptive. By distinction,  Florida  and Texas  —allow attorneys to use keywords and phrases to promote with the caveat that the adverts will have to be designed so as not to trick consumers into contemplating they are heading to 1 firm’s web-site when they are alternatively direct to a different.

But the bar regulations really do not a great deal issue mainly because more and more, legislation companies whose names have been appropriated are suing rivals and winning. As the Every day Report On the net studies, a Ga court a short while ago enjoined a Texas advertising agency termed ELM from managing adverts for a legislation agency that employed a rival firm’s trade name to draw targeted traffic to the marketing firm’s web-site. Additional compounding the confusion, the advertising corporation employed photos of the rival firm’s web-site as qualifications for the adverts and provided telephone quantities to phone facilities the place operators were instructed to use a generic greeting so that callers would think that they experienced arrived at the rival firm’s answering provider.

By the way, this isn’t the to start with time that the ELM was enjoined from deceptive methods. Very last March, a federal district court in Ohio issued an injunction barring ELM from referencing other rivals in its on-line advert campaigns.

From my point of view, the follow of acquiring a competitor firm’s keywords and phrases and buying and selling off their tough-fought on-line visibility to travel targeted traffic to one’s personal web-site is viscerally improper. Also, the follow will make it a lot more difficult for consumers to training their unfettered right to the legal professional of their picking out by sending consumers on a wild goose chase to obtain the agency that they at first searched for.

That explained, grievance committees aren’t the appropriate discussion board to adjudicate deceptive marketing methods. In its place, attorneys who pick out to promote on-line should to be matter to the same specifications as any other corporation together with prospective legal responsibility for deceptive advertising methods. That should to be explanation more than enough to discourage companies from applying this tactic to promote authorized providers.

Shares 0

Post Author: gupta

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *