A prosecution qualified in the Monthly bill Cosby sexual intercourse assault retrial, forensic psychiatrist Barbara Ziv, may perhaps establish to be a person of the most crucial witnesses if prosecutors prevail, the Washington Submit reviews. Ziv testified about “rape myths” — broadly thought misconceptions about the habits of victims of rape and sexual assault, these as expecting gals to immediately file law enforcement reviews and to reduce off call with the gentlemen who assault them. “Most widespread knowledge about sexual assault is erroneous,” Ziv reported. The Cosby retrial is shaping up as a referendum on rape myths. Prosecutors, who rested their circumstance Thursday, are betting on jurors absorbing the principle and making use of it to Andrea Constand’s testimony, specially her habits soon after she suggests Cosby assaulted her in 2004.
The main of the defense circumstance is a portrayal of Constand as a liar and extortionist. Cosby’s lawyers are hoping to raise uncertainties that she is a accurate target by pounding her with queries about the same kinds of behaviors that Ziv described as commonplace for gals who have been sexually assaulted. Ziv testified that no a lot more than seven % of sexual assault allegations are fake, and she thinks the range could be as reduced as two %. Ziv suggests rape myths persist inspite of the voluminous tutorial exploration that undercuts them. Folks normally feel sexual assault is committed by strangers when, in fact, 85 percent of victims know their attackers. Fewer than 30 percent of sexual crimes are described to law enforcement. Crucially for the Cosby circumstance, she testified that victims are often fuzzy about specifics, commonly hold out for very long periods to report their crimes and usually manage call with their attackers to try out to “make sense” of what transpired to them. Constand was pressured to confess below a barrage of queries from Cosby’s attorney, Tom Mesereau, that she’d gotten essential specifics erroneous.