New Popehat Podcast Explores Free Speech By Way Of Animal Cruelty Laws

Considering that we very first reviewed it again in February, Popehat’s “Make No Law” podcast is hitting it out of the park when it arrives to Initial Modification content material.

This 7 days is no exception, with a discussion of United States v. Stevens, the Supreme Court case dealing with the Animal Crush Video Prohibition Act of 2010, a person of those people legal guidelines that helps make you recognize Congress will legislate on just about something if it allows them to place off crucial work for a whilst. From the show’s description:

In this episode of Make No Regulation, the Initial Modification Podcast by Popehat.com, host Ken White examines United States v. Stevens and the issue of no matter if the governing administration can frequently come to the Supreme Court with probable exceptions to the Initial Modification. The episode characteristics enter from Marc Randazza, a nationally-regarded Initial Modification and mental property lawyer. It also examines other suitable cases together with New York v. Ferber, a 1982 case in which the Supreme Court decided that the governing administration could punish distribution of child pornography even if it didn’t satisfy the Miller check for obscenity.

As an additional bonus, hear thoroughly for some familiar voices participating in some of the critical voiceover roles…

Take pleasure in!

Previously: New Initial Modification Podcast From ‘Popehat’ For Your Weekend Listening Enjoyment


HeadshotJoe Patrice is an editor at Above the Regulation and co-host of Thinking Like A Lawyer. Really feel absolutely free to email any suggestions, inquiries, or remarks. Stick to him on Twitter if you’re intrigued in regulation, politics, and a healthier dose of higher education sporting activities news.

Shares 0

Post Author: gupta

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *