Posted Mon, March 26th, 2018 9:54 am by Initial Mondays
Stay from Yale Law College, it’s Initial Mondays! We’re joined by Joseph Goldstein Lecturer in Law and Knight Distinguished Journalist in Residence Linda Greenhouse. Initial, we talk about the orders docket — what does it sign when the 3 liberal justices be part of Justice Stephen Breyer in a assertion about denying a dying penalty circumstance? Then, we handle the trickle of viewpoints that have arrive out and speculate about what’s holding back again the floodwaters. We go on to recapping the argument in NIFLA v. Becerra, the circumstance about abortion and the Initial Amendment. Is Justice Anthony Kennedy ideal in that justices shouldn’t use the web to dietary supplement the document? Last but not least, we preview Hughes v. United States and Benisek v. Lamone. For the latter, we theorize about why the Supreme Court is hearing a further partisan-gerrymandering circumstance when Gill v. Whitford is however pending.
With court docket organization taken care of, we get some time to talk to Linda about some of her current crafting, like her perspective of Main Justice John Roberts’ search for center floor, and how she thinks Justice Antonin Scalia’s legacy is holding up.
And since it’s are living, we’ll near with a several audience thoughts! Many many thanks to Yale Law College for internet hosting us, and to Linda Greenhouse for becoming a member of our dialogue.
Initial Mondays Podcast,
OT2017 #19: “This Classroom Is Not Full”,
SCOTUSblog (Mar. 26, 2018, 9:54 AM),