On February 6th, the Santa Barbara County Board of Supervisors met to contemplate an ordinance and coverage amendments for land use activities linked with industrial hashish. At this time and historically, all industrial hashish activities have been prohibited in unincorporated Santa Barbara County. The Board of Supervisors authorized the proposed ordinances “in concept,” jointly with some revisions about buffer zones, a delay in instituting energy conservation designs, an elimination of odor regulate demands on specified large parcels in the AG-2 zone, a limit on in which outdoor cannabis cultivation is authorized, and a cap on the range of retail destinations. The ordinances will receive a second reading through at the next conference on February 13th, and will possible be adopted.
A single of the highlights from the conference was the conclusion to cap the range of available cannabis retail licenses at 8. These licenses will undoubtedly be prized. Be aware that originally, the county had no cap, and there would have been 284 parcels in which retail retailers had been authorized, a range that the Board of Supervisors considered abnormal and “outrageous.”
Listed here are some of the highlights from the proposed ordinances:
- No industrial hashish activity will be authorized in the places of Montecito that are subject to the Montecido Land Use and Improvement Code (MLUDC) restrictions.
- For places subject to the MLUDC’s restrictions, the subsequent would be authorized.
- Professional hashish cultivation and nurseries, subject to a Land Use Permit (LUP) in the AG-I, AG-II, C-3, M-RP, M-2 and M-2 zones
- Non-unstable production, subject to an LUP, in the AG-I, AG-II, C-1, C-2, C-3, CS, SC, M-RP, M-1, M-2, MU, CM-LA, OT-R/LC, and OT-R/GC zones
- Risky production subject to a Key Conditional Use Permit (CUP) in the AG-I-AG-II, M-1, and M-2 zones
- Testing, subject to an LUP in the C-3, PI, MR-P, M-1, and M-2 zones
- Retail product sales, subject to an LUP, in the C-1, C-2, C-3, SC, M-1, MU, CM-LA, OT-R/LC, and OT-RGC zones
- Distribution subject to a Insignificant CUP (MCUP) in the AG-1 zone, and subject to an LUP in the AG-II, C-3, M-RP, M-1, and M-2 zones and
- Microbusinesses, subject to a CUP in the AG-II, C-1, C-2, C-3, CS, M-1, and M-2 zones.
- For places subject to the Coastal Zoning Ordinance (CZO) restrictions, the subsequent would be authorized:
- Professional hashish cultivation and nurseries subject to an LUP in the AG-I, AG-II, and M-RP zones
- Non-unstable production subject to an LUP in the AG-I, AG-II, C-1, C-2, and M-RP zones
- Risky production subject to a CUP in the AG-I and AG-II zones
- Testing subject to an LUP in the PI and MR-P zones
- Retail product sales subject to an LUP in the C-1 and C-2 zones
- Distribution subject to a MCUP in the AG-I zone, and subject to an LUP in the AG-II and M-RP zones and
- Microbusinesses subject to a CUP in the AG-II, C-1, and C-2 zones.
- Professional hashish cultivation, nursery, non-unstable production, distribution, or retail takes advantage of would not be permissible in 600-toes of a university, working day care, or youth heart.
- Risky production would not be permissible in 1,200-toes of a university, working day care, or youth heart.
- Manufacturing and distribution takes advantage of would only be permissible as accent takes advantage of to hashish cultivation in the AG-I and AG-II zones.
- Professional hashish cultivation on tons that are positioned in an Present Produced Rural Neighborhood (EDRN), as perfectly as cultivation that would have to have the use of a roadway positioned in an EDRN as the sole signifies of access to the ton on which the cultivation would happen, would have to have a CUP.
- Professional hashish activity would also be subject to normal improvement expectations including:
- Compliance with state and neighborhood restrictions
- Preparing of archaeological and paleontological surveys
- Preparing and implementation of an energy conservation approach
- Fencing and security approach
- Landscape and screening approach
- Lights approach
- Sound approach
- Odor abatement approach and
- Tree safety, habitat defend, and wildlife movement designs.
When these are not the most onerous neighborhood allowing demands we’ve noticed, they are undoubtedly extensive. The Board of Supervisors acknowledged that enforcement in opposition to illegal hashish operations in the County has been tough, and has pledged, irrespective of whether or not this ordinance passes, to appreciably boost enforcement assets aimed at unlicensed hashish operations. It will as a result be very important for anyone running or looking for to function in Santa Barbara County to adhere to the improvement and adoption of these restrictions, and to be organized for the license application course of action the moment it commences. As always, we’ll be subsequent these developments closely.